<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
			<channel>
				<title>RealClearPolitics - Homepage</title>
				<link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/</link>
				<description></description>
				<language>en</language>
				<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>			
				<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:53:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
				<generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
				<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
				<item>
					<title>A Back-&amp;-Forth Race Between Romney &amp; Mr. Random</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:47:55 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ David Carr, NYT<br/>]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/a_back-amp-forth_race_between_romney_amp_mr_random_273980.html</link><originalLink>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/whos-leading-the-republican-presidential-race-mr-random-of-course/?pagemode=print</originalLink><mobileLink></mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100273980</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>David Carr, NYT</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>GOP Voters Hoping for Brokered Convention?</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:17:43 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Michael Memoli, LA Times<br/>]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/gop_voters_hoping_for_brokered_convention_274064.html</link><originalLink>http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-brokered-convention-gop-race-20120222,0,665723.story</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-brokered-convention-gop-race-20120222,0,665723.story</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274064</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Michael Memoli, LA Times</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>Politicians Fiddle While Fiscal Crisis Looms</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:40:56 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ John Stossel, FOX Business<br/>Imagine this family budget:Last year, you earned $24,700. But you spent $37,900, incurring $13,300 in debt, and you were already $153,500 in debt.So you say, &quot;I promise I&apos;ll spend $300 less this year!&quot;Anyone can see that your cutback is pathetic and that you need to spend&#194;&#160;much less.Yet if you add eight zeroes, that&apos;s America&apos;s budget.The president says again that he will cut spending -- but don&apos;t be fooled. He wants to spend more on some items, those he euphemistically calls &quot;invest(ment) in the things that will help grow our economy.&quot; (As though...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/politicians_fiddle_while_fiscal_crisis_looms_113205.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/politicians_fiddle_while_fiscal_crisis_looms_113205.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/politicians_fiddle_while_fiscal_crisis_looms_113205.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">200274014</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>John Stossel, FOX Business</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/100219_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="173" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/100219_3_.jpg" height="62" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>100219</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Forget &quot;Uncertainty&quot;: The Economy Is Back</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:40:27 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Andrew Leonard, Salon<br/>Employees work on the Volkswagen assembly line in Chattanooga, Tenn.  &#194;&#160;(Credit: Reuters/Billy Weeks)								Whatever happened to the dread horror of job-killing uncertainty? Just last year, the talking point was all the rage, unanimously chorused by GOP pundits, politicians and economists looking to hammer President Obama for a stalled-out economy.The argument was simple: Employers were refusing to hire because they feared the &amp;quot;regulatory uncertainty&amp;quot;&#157; flowing in the wake of the passage of the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank bank reform law. Terrified that the future...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/forget_quotuncertaintyquot_the_economy_is_back_274066.html</link><originalLink>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/how_uncertainty_didnt_kill_the_economy/singleton</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/how_uncertainty_didnt_kill_the_economy/singleton</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274066</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Andrew Leonard, Salon</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>Is Romney Reading Krugman?</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:13:40 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Andrew Rosenthal, New York Times<br/>]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/is_romney_reading_krugman_274063.html</link><originalLink>http://loyalopposition.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/is-romney-reading-krugman/</originalLink><mobileLink></mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274063</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Andrew Rosenthal, New York Times</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>Media Power Defining Santorum</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:19:03 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Steve McCann, American Thinker<br/>Over the past thirty years, a strange thing has happened on the path to the presidency.&amp;nbsp; With the advent of the twenty-four-hour news cycle and the proliferation of media outlets, potential presidential nominees can no longer control or establish their image in the minds of the public.This is particularly true of someone whom the public does not know.&amp;nbsp; Barack Obama was a virtual unknown when he decided to run for the White House in 2007.&amp;nbsp; But he had three major characteristics that worked in his favor: 1) he was of African-American descent; 2) as Joe Biden put, it...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/media_power_defining_santorum_274048.html</link><originalLink>http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/media_power_defining_santorum.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/media_power_defining_santorum.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274048</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Steve McCann, American Thinker</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>2012 and the Merits of &quot;Likeability&quot;</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:28:20 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Alexis Simendinger, RealClearPolitics<br/>In October 2006, shortly before Rick Santorum lost his bid for re-election to the Senate by the largest margin ever recorded by a losing GOP incumbent senator, his unfavorable ratings in Pennsylvania had soared to heights never before seen in the state&apos;s Keystone Poll.Forty-six percent of Pennsylvania voters viewed Santorum unfavorably -- a gloomy surge of nine points in just one month. Back then, Santorum was unable to draw Pennsylvania voters toward his candidacy, and his support in the state barely budged in the 18 months leading up to his defeat by Democrat Bob Casey.Fast-forward to...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/santorum_romney_obama_and_the_merits_of_likeability_113210.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/santorum_romney_obama_and_the_merits_of_likeability_113210.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/santorum_romney_obama_and_the_merits_of_likeability_113210.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">200274053</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Alexis Simendinger, RealClearPolitics</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125486_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="167" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125486_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125486</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Let&#039;s Stop Using the Word Chink</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:59:12 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Huan Hsu, Slate<br/>By Huan Hsu&#124;Posted Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2012, at 5:05 PM ETPhoto by Chris Trotman/Getty Images.Perhaps it was inevitable that a Jeremy Lin pun would eventually breach the boundaries of good taste. Last Friday, after the Lin-fueled New York Knicks had their seven-game winning streak stopped by the lowly New Orleans Hornets, ESPN.com&amp;rsquo;s mobile site posted a game recap and Lin photo alongside the headline &amp;ldquo;Chink in the Armor.&amp;rdquo; The phrasing was only up for around 30 minutes, but that was plenty of time to aggrieve a rainbow coalition of fans and commentators, who...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/let039s_stop_using_the_word_chink_274060.html</link><originalLink>http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/the_good_word/2012/02/chink_in_the_armor_jeremy_lin_why_it_s_time_to_retire_the_phrase_for_good_.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/the_good_word/2012/02/chink_in_the_armor_jeremy_lin_why_it_s_time_to_retire_the_phrase_for_good_.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274060</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Huan Hsu, Slate</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>Global Warming Alarmists Resort to Hoax</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:30 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ John Hinderaker, Power Line<br/>]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/global_warming_alarmists_resort_to_hoax_274054.html</link><originalLink>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/02/global-warming-alarmists-resort-to-hoax.php</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/02/global-warming-alarmists-resort-to-hoax.php</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274054</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>John Hinderaker, Power Line</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>Why Romney&#039;s Dog Story Will Be an Issue</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:34:56 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Margaret Carlson, Bloomberg<br/>Margaret Carlson is a Bloomberg View columnist appearing on Wednesdays. A former White House correspondent for TIME, she was also TIME&apos;s first woman columnist. She appeared on CNN&apos;s &quot;Capital Gang&quot; for 15 years.Mitt Romney&apos;s enduring problem is
that we don&apos;t know what lies beneath the eager-to-please
demeanor that leads him to emit impenetrable lines like the one
this weekend about loving Michigan because its &amp;quot;trees are the
right height.&amp;quot;&#157; This creates a vacuum that inevitably gets filled with
morsels of insight like the old story about his...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/why_romney039s_dog_story_will_be_an_issue_274058.html</link><originalLink>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/roof-rover-dogs-romney-humanization-drive-commentary-by-margaret-carlson.html</originalLink><mobileLink></mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274058</guid>
				 <category>PM Update</category>
				 <author>Margaret Carlson, Bloomberg</author></item>
				<item>
					<title>GOP Candidates Vie for Advantage in Debate</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:39:40 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Davis &amp; Lerer, Bloomberg<br/>Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney are vying to define each other and gain an edge in a tightening Republican presidential race as they and two other rivals meet tonight in Arizona for a potentially crucial televised encounter.The debate in Mesa, Arizona, marks the first time in almost a month that the candidates will face off on the same stage, and it&amp;rsquo;s also the first since Santorum usurped Romney&amp;rsquo;s perch at the top of national polls of the Republican contest.&amp;nbsp;]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/gop_candidates_vie_for_advantage_in_debate_274037.html</link><originalLink>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-20/romney-focuses-on-economy-while-stumping-for-votes-cash-in-ohio.html</originalLink><mobileLink></mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274037</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Davis &amp; Lerer, Bloomberg</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125509_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="166" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125509_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125509</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Arizona Contest Puts Pressure on Romney</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:44:32 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Erin McPike, RealClearPolitics<br/>With polls showing Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum within the margin of error of each other in Arizona and Michigan, both candidates have some tough decisions to make ahead of the states&apos; primaries on Tuesday.Just a few weeks ago, Romney seemed headed for big wins in both races. Now he finds himself trailing Santorum in his native Michigan, and Santorum creeping up on him in Arizona. That means the top rivals have to carefully figure out how to best divide their time and energy over the next six days.Two polls in two days have shown Santorum pulling close to Romney in the Grand Canyon...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/tightening_arizona_race_heightens_pressure_on_romney_113209.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/tightening_arizona_race_heightens_pressure_on_romney_113209.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/tightening_arizona_race_heightens_pressure_on_romney_113209.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">200274036</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Erin McPike, RealClearPolitics</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124211_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="177" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124211_3_.jpg" height="64" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>124211</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>The GOP&#039;s Desperate Trashing of the Obama Recovery</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:40:31 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Jon Chait, NY Mag<br/>As the economic recovery picks up speed, Republicans have subtly altered their case. They increasingly emphasize that the economy is performing badly, as opposed to taking for granted that it&amp;rsquo;s awful and arguing about why. &amp;ldquo;Let&amp;rsquo;s not kid ourselves: this is the worst recovery ever from a serious recession, and history says the deeper the down, the sharper the up,&amp;rdquo; asserted Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels on CNN&amp;rsquo;s&amp;nbsp;State of the Union. &amp;ldquo;It should have been a very vigorous one. Hasn&amp;rsquo;t been.&amp;rdquo; Conservative...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/the_gop039s_desperate_trashing_of_the_obama_recovery_274043.html</link><originalLink>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/02/republicans-trashing-the-obama-recovery.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/02/republicans-trashing-the-obama-recovery.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274043</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Jon Chait, NY Mag</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124861_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="150" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124861_3_.jpg" height="54" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>124861</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>If Economy Is Rising, Why Is Dependency Growing?</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:04:51 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Eric Singer, Investors<br/>The government is at full throttle to present the economy as improving especially in light of the upcoming election. At the same time, there has been a stunning rise in dependency as most recently presented by the Heritage Foundation.Heritage defines dependency as significantly depending on the government for help in two of the following basic expense items: housing, food, shelter, income security or higher education.]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/if_economy_is_rising_why_is_dependency_growing_274032.html</link><originalLink>http://news.investors.com/article/601761/201202211802/government-dependency-is-growing.htm</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.realclearmarkets.com/</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274032</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Eric Singer, Investors</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/122345_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="143" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/122345_3_.jpg" height="51" width="89" />
				 	<media:title>122345</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>WH Seeks to Deflect Blame on Rising Gas Prices</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:42:13 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Alister Bull, Reuters<br/>Under fire from Republicans over rising gasoline prices, the White House on Tuesday highlighted factors beyond its control for gains in global oil markets, as it sought to deflect blame over a potentially damaging election-year issue.Gas prices, which rose 7 cents a gallon last week, could unsettle economic confidence at a time when the U.S. recovery appears to be gathering pace, hurting President Barack Obama as voters review his track record ahead of the November 6 ballot.]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/wh_seeks_to_deflect_blame_on_rising_gas_prices_274042.html</link><originalLink>http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/21/us-usa-whitehouse-gasoline-idUSTRE81K23P20120221</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/21/us-usa-whitehouse-gasoline-idUSTRE81K23P20120221</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274042</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Alister Bull, Reuters</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125328_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="146" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125328_3_.jpg" height="53" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125328</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Dems Delivering on Promise of Expensive Gas</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:39:25 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ David Harsanyi, Examiner<br/>Gas prices are spiking. That&apos;s great news, right? We have to wean ourselves off the stuff. At least that&apos;s what we&apos;ve been hearing for years. Oil is dirty. We import it from nations that hate our guts (like Canada!). And moreover, we&apos;re running out. Oil is &quot;finite.&quot; Finite much in the way water is finite.So why aren&apos;t Democrats making the case that the spike in prices is a good thing? Isn&apos;t this basically our energy policy these days? How we &quot;win the future&quot;? If high energy prices were to damage President Barack Obama&apos;s re-election...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/arent_high_gas_prices_what_democrats_want_113206.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/arent_high_gas_prices_what_democrats_want_113206.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/arent_high_gas_prices_what_democrats_want_113206.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">200274012</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>David Harsanyi, Examiner</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125423_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="158" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125423_3_.jpg" height="57" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125423</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Rick Santorum&#039;s Religious Fanaticism</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:43:27 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Maureen Dowd, New York Times<br/>Rick Santorum has been called a latter-day Savonarola.That&amp;rsquo;s far too grand. He&amp;rsquo;s more like a small-town mullah.&amp;ldquo;Satan has his sights on the United States of America,&amp;rdquo; the conservative presidential candidate warned in 2008. &amp;ldquo;Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/rick_santorum039s_religious_fanaticism_274015.html</link><originalLink>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/dowd-ricks-religious-fanaticism.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/dowd-ricks-religious-fanaticism.xml</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274015</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Maureen Dowd, New York Times</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125510_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="180" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125510_3_.jpg" height="65" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125510</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Media All &quot;Wee-Weed Up&quot; Over Santorum</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:44:08 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Sarah Palin, FOX News<br/>&quot;They will attack any conservatives who boldly proclaims their faith and talks about there is good in the world and there&apos;s evil in the world and that&apos;s what Rick Santorum was talking about. And this was a speech that he gave back in 2008 where he named evil as Satan. And for these lame-stream media characters to get all wee-weed up about that, first you have to ask yourself, &apos;Have they ever attended a Sunday school class even? Have they never heard of this terminology before?&quot; And that&apos;s why they got so, you know, just whacked out about the speech,&quot; Sarah...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/02/21/palin_media_getting_wee-weed_up_over_santorums_satan_remark.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/02/21/palin_media_getting_wee-weed_up_over_santorums_satan_remark.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/02/21/palin_media_getting_wee-weed_up_over_santorums_satan_remark.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">700274040</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Sarah Palin, FOX News</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/123808_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="167" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/123808_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>123808</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Romney&#039;s Pro-Life Conversion: Spin vs. Truth</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:45:03 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ William Saletan, Slate<br/>Slate&amp;rsquo;s National Correspondent William Saletan zeroes in on the many ways Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has changed his story over the years on the subject of abortion.&amp;nbsp;]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/romney039s_pro-life_conversion_spin_vs_truth_274038.html</link><originalLink>http://www.slatev.com/video/romneys-abortion-record-spin-vs-truth/</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.slatev.com/video/romneys-abortion-record-spin-vs-truth/</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274038</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>William Saletan, Slate</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125405_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="165" width="249" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125405_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125405</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>GOP Establishment to Blame for 2012 Debacle</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:59:45 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Geoffrey Kabaservice, TNR<br/>A specter is haunting the Republican establishment&amp;mdash;the specter of Barry Goldwater. With recent polling data suggesting that Rick Santorum has surged ahead of Mitt Romney among Republican voters nationwide, the people whose livelihoods depend on Republican electoral victories are terrified by the growing possibility of a massive wipeout in November, much like the one that Republicans experienced in 1964, when Goldwater was their nominee.&amp;nbsp;]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/gop_establishment_to_blame_for_2012_debacle_274035.html</link><originalLink>http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/100893/barry-goldwater-santorum-republican-establishment-hidden-conservative-majority</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/100893/barry-goldwater-santorum-republican-establishment-hidden-conservative-majority</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274035</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Geoffrey Kabaservice, TNR</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/120869_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="166" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/120869_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>120869</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Feds Wage War on Hair Dryers, Fresh Milk</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:02:56 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Charles Hurt, Wash Times<br/>All praise be to Allah!The federal government apparently has eradicated the illegal immigration that cripples America. It has eliminated the staggering unemployment that has brought so much misery to so many families. And, apparently, it has erased the suffocating debt and added enough spunk to the economy that it no longer needs all of those little tax dollars that small businesses provide.That is why the federal government has so much time these days for fine-tuning our society in ways that might seem frivolous if we didn&amp;rsquo;t have so much patience and extra money lying...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/feds_wage_war_on_hair_dryers_fresh_milk_274029.html</link><originalLink>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/21/hurt-federal-war-on-hair-dryers-fresh-milk/</originalLink><mobileLink>http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/21/hurt-federal-war-on-hair-dryers-fresh-milk/</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274029</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Charles Hurt, Wash Times</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125514_1_.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" height="185" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125514_3_.jpeg" height="66" width="89" />
				 	<media:title>125514</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Egypt&#039;s Step Backward</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:04:32 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Thomas Friedman, New York Times<br/>Sadly, the transitional government in Egypt today appears determined to shoot itself in both feet.On Sunday, it will put on trial 43 people, including at least 16 U.S. citizens, for allegedly bringing unregistered funds into Egypt to promote democracy without a license. Egypt has every right to control international organizations operating within its borders. But the truth is that when these democracy groups filed their registration papers years ago under the autocracy of Hosni Mubarak, they were informed that the papers were in order and that approval was pending.]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/egypt039s_step_backward_274013.html</link><originalLink>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/friedman-fayzas-last-dance.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/friedman-fayzas-last-dance.xml</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274013</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Thomas Friedman, New York Times</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125389_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="172" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125389_3_.jpg" height="62" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125389</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>The &quot;Fairness&quot; Fraud</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:03:38 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Thomas Sowell, Investor's Business Daily<br/>During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration&apos;s tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of &quot;fairness.&quot;He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent couple in Connecticut.No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more &quot;fair&quot; for others?Even if additional tax revenue...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/the_fairness_fraud_113204.html</link><originalLink>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/the_fairness_fraud_113204.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/22/the_fairness_fraud_113204.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">200274019</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Thomas Sowell, Investor's Business Daily</author><media:content url="http://images.rcw.realclearpolitics.com/96745_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="162" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcw.realclearpolitics.com/96745_3_.jpg" height="58" width="89" />
				 	<media:title>96745</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Will Supreme Court End Affirmative Action?</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:04:23 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Adam Winkler, Daily Beast<br/>On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a potentially landmark case that could end race-based affirmative action as we know it. Although just nine years ago the justices held that public universities could use race as a factor in admissions, much has changed since then, including the election of the first African-American to the presidency. For the University of Texas, whose admissions policy is now being challenged, the only change that matters is the new personnel on the Supreme Court. Since the addition of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, the court has shifted...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/will_supreme_court_end_affirmative_action_274044.html</link><originalLink>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/21/will-supreme-court-end-affirmative-action-with-fisher-v-university-of-texas.html</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/21/will-supreme-court-end-affirmative-action-with-fisher-v-university-of-texas.html</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274044</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Adam Winkler, Daily Beast</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/24686_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="147" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/24686_3_.jpg" height="53" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>24686</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Is Conservative Philanthropy Ignoring the Poor?</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:05:33 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ William Schambra, CoP<br/>Mitt Romney announces that he is &amp;ldquo;not concerned about the very poor.&amp;rdquo; Newt Gingrich calls for drafting low-income students to work as janitors. Meanwhile, the other candidates for the Republican presidential nomination have little at all to say about the poor, beyond demands to cut federal programs that focus on their needs.All this confirms one of the oldest stereotypes in American politics: that conservatives are uncaring, hardhearted skinflints, unworthy to govern a people known for charity and compassion.&amp;nbsp;]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/is_conservative_philanthropy_ignoring_the_poor_274023.html</link><originalLink>http://philanthropy.com/article/Is-Conservative-Philanthropy/130834/</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://philanthropy.com/article/Is-Conservative-Philanthropy/130834/</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274023</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>William Schambra, CoP</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/123391_1_.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" height="141" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/123391_3_.jpeg" height="51" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>123391</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Netflix CEO Seeks Rebound From Disaster</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:07:25 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ William Cohan, Vanity Fair<br/>Reed Hastings, 51, the C.E.O. of Netflix, is bloody but only slightly bowed. When his company was at the pinnacle of success, just last summer, he refused my repeated requests to discuss his apparent business prowess. He claimed to be reticent about being interviewed, disdaining the limelight and the attention it brings to him and his family. His low-key, unrehearsed manner&amp;mdash;he is prone to gaffes involving hot tubs, among other things&amp;mdash;makes it clear he is not having fun when he talks to the media. What little publicity he does is only to benefit Netflix....]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/netflix_ceo_seeks_rebound_from_disaster_274045.html</link><originalLink>http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2012/02/netflix-201202</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2012/02/netflix-201202</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100274045</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>William Cohan, Vanity Fair</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125516_1_.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" height="169" width="249" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125516_3_.jpeg" height="61" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125516</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Political Correctness Controls the Dictionary</title>
                                        <subtitle></subtitle>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:09:24 -0600</pubDate>
					<fullpubdate>02/22/2012/00/00/00</fullpubdate>
					<description><![CDATA[ Tommy De Seno, Ricochet<br/>The English language grew harder to learn, speak and understand this weekend. ESPN editor Anthony Federico was fired for penning a headline about New York Knicks&amp;rsquo; phenom Jeremy Lin (who is American) having a high rate of turnovers, noting that his lack of ball control may be a &amp;ldquo;chink in his armor.&amp;rdquo;As if US - Chinese relations weren&amp;rsquo;t strained enough, Rep. Judy Chu (D, Calif.) claimed the use of what she called &amp;ldquo;the C word&amp;rdquo; (apparently now taking its righteously indignant place among initialized words along side the N word) was a...]]></description><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/political_correctness_controls_the_dictionary_273973.html</link><originalLink>http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Armor-Chinks-Niggardly-Sums-and-Retarded-Growth-Political-Correctness-Controls-The-Dictionary</originalLink><mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Armor-Chinks-Niggardly-Sums-and-Retarded-Growth-Political-Correctness-Controls-The-Dictionary</mobileLink>	<guid isPermaLink="false">100273973</guid>
				 <category>AM Update</category>
				 <author>Tommy De Seno, Ricochet</author><media:content url="http://images.rcs.realclearpolitics.com/125096_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="180" width="250" />
				 	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcs.realclearpolitics.com/125096_3_.jpg" height="65" width="90" />
				 	<media:title>125096</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>The Supreme Court Revisits Discrimination &amp; Government</title>
                           	<subtitle></subtitle>
					<description></description>
					<link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/the_supreme_court_revisits_discrimination_amp_government_274025.html</link>
					<originalLink>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204909104577237711751188908.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop</originalLink>
					<mobileLink>http://mobile2.wsj.com/device/article.php?mid=1&amp;CALL_URL=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204909104577237711751188908.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop</mobileLink>
					<guid isPermaLink="false">100274025</guid> 					
					<category>Editorials</category>					
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:10:12 -0600</pubDate>
					<author>WSJ</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/120794_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="159" width="250" />
						<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/120794_3_.jpg" height="57" width="90" />
						<media:title>120794</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>The Test of Talking to Iran</title>
                           	<subtitle></subtitle>
					<description></description>
					<link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/the_test_of_talking_to_iran_274022.html</link>
					<originalLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-test-of-talking-to-iran/2012/02/21/gIQAPah4RR_story.html</originalLink>
					<mobileLink></mobileLink>
					<guid isPermaLink="false">100274022</guid> 					
					<category>Editorials</category>					
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:10:49 -0600</pubDate>
					<author>Washington Post</author><media:content url="http://images.rcw.realclearpolitics.com/124644_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="166" width="250" />
						<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcw.realclearpolitics.com/124644_3_.jpg" height="60" width="90" />
						<media:title>124644</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Canadian Oil Sands Shouldn&#039;t Be Pawn in Climate Debate</title>
                           	<subtitle></subtitle>
					<description></description>
					<link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/canadian_oil_sands_shouldn039t_be_pawn_in_climate_debate_274046.html</link>
					<originalLink>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/editorials/oil-sands-shouldnt-be-pawn-in-climate-change-debate/article2345306/</originalLink>
					<mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/editorials/oil-sands-shouldnt-be-pawn-in-climate-change-debate/article2345306/</mobileLink>
					<guid isPermaLink="false">100274046</guid> 					
					<category>Editorials</category>					
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:13:07 -0600</pubDate>
					<author>Globe &amp; Mail</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125519_1_.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" height="194" width="250" />
						<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/125519_3_.jpeg" height="70" width="90" />
						<media:title>125519</media:title></item>
				<item>
					<title>Romney Best Choice for Michigan</title>
                           	<subtitle></subtitle>
					<description></description>
					<link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/02/22/romney_best_choice_for_michigan_274031.html</link>
					<originalLink>http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120222/OPINION01/202220315/Detroit-News-endorsement-Mitt-Romney-Michigan-GOP-primary?odyssey=tab&#124;topnews&#124;text&#124;FRONTPAGE</originalLink>
					<mobileLink>http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120222/OPINION01/202220315/Detroit-News-endorsement-Mitt-Romney-Michigan-GOP-primary?odyssey=tab&#124;topnews&#124;text&#124;FRONTPAGE</mobileLink>
					<guid isPermaLink="false">100274031</guid> 					
					<category>Editorials</category>					
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:13:50 -0600</pubDate>
					<author>Detroit News</author><media:content url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124862_1_.jpg" type="image/jpeg" height="173" width="250" />
						<media:thumbnail url="http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/124862_3_.jpg" height="62" width="90" />
						<media:title>124862</media:title></item></channel></rss>
